Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jeff Tiedrich's avatar

I know I'm going to get an earful about this, so let me state that Gavin Newsom is far from perfect. very far from perfect. I have a lot of problems with the stuff he's done. but right now, he's meeting the moment, and we should celebrate that

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Democrats need to move beyond simplistic, concrete reasoning (e.g., “If we gerrymander too, we become just like them”) and instead recognize the complex reality we are living in with fascist tactics being normalized and used to dismantle democracy itself. Formal logic would ask: What is the goal? If the goal is to protect democratic institutions, human rights, and free elections, then any strategy that effectively preserves those ends, as long as it does not fundamentally destroy those values, should be on the table. Moral clarity means understanding that the greatest ethical failure is not breaking a norm, but allowing injustice, harm, and authoritarian control to spread unopposed.

In a context where people are being forcibly taken off the streets, immigrants are placed in camps, and laws are being weaponized to strip citizens of rights, the situation demands more than “polite” or “self-righteous” political solutions. These are not normal political disagreements, they’re systemic attacks on vulnerable communities and on the framework of democracy itself. Defending against that requires muscular, unapologetic resistance, not because Democrats want to mimic fascists, but because inaction or weak action enables fascists. Just as a person has the right to fight back when physically attacked, democracy has the right and obligation to defend itself with forceful, strategic action when it is being dismantled in broad daylight.

Democrats must abandon their posture of moral absolutism and meet power with power. Operating with integrity is noble, but when that integrity becomes a shield for inaction, it risks becoming complicity. History offers painful lessons: during the rise of fascism in Europe, many liberal and democratic forces failed not because they lacked values, but because they clung to procedural purity while their enemies weaponized the system. The refusal to act decisively out of a fear of “stooping to their level” has enabled those regimes to take root. Today’s Democratic leadership often displays a kind of developmental rigidity, holding to black-and-white ideals in a time that demands adaptive, strategic thinking rooted in formal logic and a deeper moral clarity. This isn’t about abandoning principles, but it’s about defending them with the full force necessary to preserve the republic.

Expand full comment
409 more comments...

No posts